Monday, November 27, 2017

Crimes Of Globalization

    There is absolutely no question that globalization has promoted crime throughout the world. What are crimes of globalization? Crimes of globalization are crimes that have happened as a result of globalization such as human trafficking, illicit markets, state-corporate crimes and crimes against humanity. The World Bank and IMF are financial institutions that have played a key role in perpetrating global crime. As our world becomes increasingly connected, so does the need for global governance and because of this, these financial groups become stronger, putting the more affluent countries in power.

   Within the IMF and the World Bank, it is clear that more developed nations dominate decision-making as voting power is determined by the amount of money that each country contributes. The disproportionate amount of power, held by more affluent countries means that the interests of corporations from industrialized countries will be put above the needs of the poorer, developing nations; ironically the countries that need the most help. For example, one of the critical aspects of the IMF and World Bank that only seem to promote global crime and deception, are SAPs. The SAPs are loans provided by the IMF and World Bank to countries experiencing economic crises; the impact of SAPs was extremely detrimental on the Philippines. As a result, the Philippines gives almost half of its’ revenue towards debt repayment instead of being invested in a project that would benefit their economy; their corrupt leaders also pocketed some of the money. Overall, there have been massive cuts made within the country, specifically regarding education, food, shelter, and health, all of which are vital to the preservation of their citizens, most of whom now live in poverty. The impact that the IMF and World Bank had on the Philippines can be categorized as one of the crimes of Globalization: Crimes against humanity.

   Globalization has also provided corporations with more consumers, now that their business has “gone global,” and because of this, there has become more competition. One of the most important rules of business is to “maximize profits, and minimize costs”; how is this achieved? Find cheap labor. While globalization has created multinational leaders, we have failed to develop international labor laws and because of these corporations like Walmart have moved their manufacturers to nations with less strict (or no) labor laws. Many consumers would be horrified to know that Walmart exposes their workers to slave-like conditions, paying them the least they possibly could in inhumane conditions. On a similar note, globalization has promoted illicit markets for drugs, antiquities and sadly, humans. Human trafficking and forced labor have been being a sad outcome of globalization. Walmart is an example of one of the crimes of globalization: Corporate crime. These markets have to be run by someone or some group, and it would be absurd to suggest that global leaders are unaware of these markets and have no power to stop them. This is where organized crime comes in; Organized crimes are being planned and controlled by these powerful transitional groups. What is unfortunate, is that too often, states are involved in these illicit markets, or at least have done nothing to stop them. For example, during the fall of the Soviet Union, there became a surplus of guns and weaponry. Rather than nations coming together to dispose of these items, there became a market where a lot of the suppliers were state leaders. This could be categorized as a state crime, yet another crime of globalization.

6 comments:

  1. Hi Morgan, I feel like there is not a clear solution to the issues you present. To repair some of the issues, such as the crimes against humanity, then there would have to be an ICC investigation. The countries that you discuss as the ones that are hurt through the increased globalization are the ones who the ICC prosecutes. So, countries such as the US who outsource many companies would never be held liable for their actions. Obviously, I think that many of the conditions in the factories in states such as the Philippines are abhorrent, but there is no clear way to fix this issue. The US companies in these states must follow the labor laws of the countries they are in, so the wage that the people who work in these factories receive are not comparable to the minimum wage in the US. The way US companies treats their foreign workers will be reminded if/when the foreign country modifies its labor laws.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Taylor, yes unfortunately I did not present a solution to this issue- therefore it cannot be found in this paper. I wish there was one, and a simple one at that. However, unfortunately these issues are so extremely deep routed and would be very difficult to change. The overall point of my paper is to discuss global crime and how it is promoted by certain institutions. As for a solution... well that may be a paper to come.

      Delete
  2. I believe that there will be crime no matter what there will be crime. Free market is generally a good thing but I do agree that big corporations exploiting poor countries is not good for the world. I believe that the only solution to this is fair trade acts and so forth.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Theo- quite honestly crime will always happen yes, but it should truly be happening on a smaller scale; by citizens, not COUNTRIES. I think that your answer is a typical one; stoic. I think that we need to face these issues and not give excuses any longer if we want to create a better world for our children.

      Delete
  3. Hey Morgan I thought this was very well written and interesting. I agree with Taylor that you are discussing a very complex issue. Globalization has certainly hurt smaller nations and larger nations have certainly gotten away with awful crimes, especially humanitarian. However, without globalization things we have today would just not be possible. If the entire world had decent labor laws than everything would cost absurd amounts and inflation would drastically rise around the world. I do think that we need to change globalization but when and how we most certainly take probably generations to solve.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Jonathan- I have to disagree with virtually everything you've said. One, i think that we have to compromise people's lives and wellbeing for "cheap" prices is not only outrageously horrible, but also wrong. Two, our products are already cheap and created to break anyway, so I question what would be the harm in getting a better product that would last us our whole lives; yeah maybe it would be more, but you would never have to buy another- imagine that!

      Delete